NeoNotes Journal Club
Andrew B. Kairalla MD, Editor

5-001 | Additional Comments | Previous Article | Next Article | Search | List of Articles | Submit Comments | Index | FSN Home Page

Heparin in Peripheral IVs

Benefit and risk of heparin for maintaining peripheral venous catheters in neonates: A placebo-controlled trial.  Klenner AF, Fusch C, Rakow A, et al.  J Pediatr 2003; 143: 741-5. 

Objectives Heparin addition to infusion fluids is used to prolong catheter patency in newborns. Heparin may also induce adverse effects such as bleeding complications and immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). One objective was peripheral venous catheter patency with heparinization of continuous infusions (0.5 IU/mL). Secondary objectives were incidences of bleeding, clinically manifest HIT, HIT antibodies, and catheter-related complications.

Study design Inclusion criteria were anticipated need for intravenous peripheral infusion (5 days for HIT-related endpoints) and postnatal age <28 days at study entry. Exclusion criteria were bodyweight <1000 g, congenital malformation, need for therapeutic anticoagulation or mechanical ventilation, and severe bleeding. HIT antibodies were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results A total of 145 infants received heparin, and 151 infants received saline. Patient characteristics, number of additional drugs, duration of treatment, and location and size of catheters did not differ. Patency of catheters was 7.4 hours longer in the heparin group (33.8 hours vs 26.4 hours, P<.0001), but the total numbers of catheters did not differ (565 vs 692, P=.3). No infant developed HIT antibodies. Incidences of bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia were comparable between groups.

Conclusions Balancing the benefits against the risks of heparin addition and the rare complication of HIT, we will not use 0.5 IU/mL heparin addition to parenteral fluids.


Comments: Adding heparin to peripheral IV solutions in neonates extends catheter patency by an average of 7 hours.  This result, while highly significant statistically, has little clinical significance since the total number of catheters needed was no different between groups. In view of the significant potential for serious medication errors involving heparin in neonates, I agree with the authors that the risks of this practice outweigh the benefits.  Similar results were found for “heparin locks” in neonates, and I suspect that most of us now flush these catheters with normal saline rather than heparin.  What about umbilical lines and central venous catheters? Should we re-think adding heparin to these?  ABK
 

Additional Comments: 

You may add your own comments to the discussion of this topic by selecting : Submit Comments.

Return to top

Hit Counter