NeoNotes Journal Club
Andrew B. Kairalla MD, Editor
4-002 | Additional Comments | Previous Article | Next Article | List of Articles | Submit Comments | Index | FSN Home Page
Hydrolyzed Protein Accelerated Feeding Advancement in Very Low Birth
Weight Infants. Mihatsch WA, Franz
AR, Hogel J, et al. Pediatrics (Dec 2002);110:1199-1203.
Background. Feeding intolerance is common in very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g) infants. Hydrolyzed protein preterm infant formula (HPF) has been shown to accelerate the gastrointestinal transit of formula. The aim of this study was to investigate whether HPF improves early feeding tolerance compared with standard preterm infant formula (SPF). We hypothesized that HPF would accelerate early enteral feeding advancement.
Methods. Primary outcome was the time from initiation of milk feeds until full feeds (150 mL/kg birth weight/d) were achieved in infants who received <10% human milk (HM) to exclude HM as a confounder. Because the availability of HM was not predictable at the time of enrollment, all eligible VLBW infants (n = 129) were randomly assigned in a randomized, controlled trial to receive HPF or SPF if HM was not available. Infants who received >10% HM (n = 42) were excluded. Milk bolus feeding every 2 to 3 hours was started at the discretion of the attending physician and advanced by 16 mL/kg/d. Preprandial gastric residuals were tolerated up to 5 mL/kg; otherwise, feedings were reduced or withheld. Data are shown as median (5th and 95th percentile).
Results. Forty-six and 41 (HPF vs SPF) infants received <10% HM. There was no significant difference with regard to birth weight, gestational age, and onset of milk feeds (day 3 [1–8] vs 4 [2–6]). The time from initiation of milk feeds to full feeds was significantly shorter with HPF feeding (10 [9–23] vs 12 [9–28] days) p = 0.003.
Conclusion. HPF improved the feeding tolerance and enabled a more rapid establishment of full enteral feeding in VLBW infants compared with SPF.
Comment.
The HPF used in this
study was Aptamil Prematil, a German formula that is not available in the
United States. The infants who
received HPF did not grow better than the SPF-fed babies; they only achieved
full enteral feedings an average of 2 days sooner.
The incidence of NEC and GI perforations was also lower in the HPF-fed
babies, but this was not statistically significant.
For a review of how lactase-treated feedings affects growth of VLBW
infants, see 3-048
on our web site. ABK.
Additional Comments: You may add your own comments to the discussion of this topic by selecting : Submit Comments.